The Complex Role of Overcorrection in ABA Therapy

While overcorrection techniques in ABA therapy aim to reduce problematic behaviors, they have sparked ethical debates regarding potential harm. Weigh the pros and cons. Explore different perspectives and ethical concerns.

Understanding Overcorrection in ABA Therapy

In the realm of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy, overcorrection is a technique used to address and modify challenging behaviors. To fully grasp the concept of overcorrection, it is essential to first understand the basics of ABA therapy.

An Overview of ABA Therapy

ABA therapy is a scientifically based approach that focuses on understanding and modifying behavior patterns. It is commonly used to support individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental disabilities. ABA therapy aims to enhance adaptive behaviors and reduce maladaptive behaviors by utilizing evidence-based techniques.

The techniques employed in ABA therapy are tailored to each individual's unique needs and goals. Behavior analysts conduct thorough assessments to identify target behaviors, and interventions are then designed to promote positive changes. These interventions may include reinforcement strategies, prompting techniques, and behavior modification procedures such as overcorrection.

What is Overcorrection in ABA Therapy?

Overcorrection is a behavior modification technique used within ABA therapy to address and reduce specific challenging behaviors. It involves providing corrective experiences to individuals in response to their inappropriate or undesirable behaviors. The goal of overcorrection is to increase the occurrence of desired behaviors while simultaneously decreasing the occurrence of unwanted behaviors.

Overcorrection typically consists of two components: restitution and positive practice. Restitution involves requiring the individual to restore the environment or situation to its original state before the inappropriate behavior occurred. This process emphasizes repairing the consequences of the behavior and teaching the individual responsibility and accountability for their actions.

Positive practice, on the other hand, focuses on having the individual practice the appropriate behavior repeatedly. This repetition helps to strengthen and reinforce the desired behavior, making it more likely to occur in the future. Positive practice overcorrection can involve verbal or physical prompts to guide the individual in performing the correct behavior.

By implementing overcorrection techniques within ABA therapy, behavior analysts aim to reshape behavior patterns and promote positive change. However, it is important to note that overcorrection procedures can be controversial and should be carefully considered based on individual needs and ethical guidelines.

Controversy Surrounding Overcorrection Procedures

Overcorrection procedures in ABA therapy have been a topic of debate and controversy within the field. Different perspectives exist regarding the effectiveness and ethical implications of overcorrection techniques. It is essential to examine these diverse viewpoints and consider the ethical concerns and criticisms associated with overcorrection in ABA therapy.

Different Perspectives on Overcorrection

The use of overcorrection procedures in ABA therapy is not universally agreed upon. Different professionals and experts in the field hold varying opinions regarding the effectiveness and appropriateness of these techniques.

Some proponents argue that overcorrection can be an effective method for addressing challenging behaviors and promoting behavior change. They believe that by providing immediate and intensive consequences for undesired behaviors, individuals can learn more quickly and effectively replace those behaviors with appropriate alternatives. Proponents also emphasize the importance of individualized treatment plans and the need for careful implementation and monitoring.

On the other hand, critics express concerns about the potential negative consequences and ethical considerations associated with overcorrection procedures. They raise questions about the potential harm caused by intense and repetitive corrective actions, as well as the impact on the individual's well-being and self-esteem. Critics argue that alternative strategies, such as positive reinforcement and fading techniques, can achieve behavior change without the potential risks and ethical concerns associated with overcorrection.

Ethical Concerns and Criticisms

Ethical concerns surrounding overcorrection procedures in ABA therapy primarily revolve around the intensity and potential harm caused by these techniques. Critics argue that overcorrection may result in emotional distress, anxiety, or even trauma for individuals undergoing the therapy. The repetitive and intense corrective actions involved in overcorrection can be seen as punitive and may not align with the principles of promoting a positive therapeutic environment.

Critics also stress the importance of informed consent and the need for transparency when implementing overcorrection procedures. It is crucial for practitioners to fully explain the potential risks and benefits of overcorrection to the individual or their caregiver, allowing them to make an informed decision about their treatment.

Moreover, the appropriateness of using overcorrection techniques for certain behaviors, such as self-stimulatory behaviors or aggressive behaviors, is another area of concern. Each individual's unique needs and circumstances should be carefully considered when determining the most appropriate and ethical course of action.

By acknowledging and exploring the different perspectives and ethical concerns surrounding overcorrection procedures in ABA therapy, professionals can engage in critical discussions and make informed decisions about the use of these techniques. It is vital to prioritize the well-being and individual needs of those undergoing therapy while ensuring ethical practices are upheld.

Examining Overcorrection Techniques

When it comes to overcorrection in ABA therapy, there are several techniques that may be employed to address and modify behaviors. Each technique has its own unique approach and considerations. In this section, we will examine three commonly used overcorrection techniques: positive practice overcorrection, restitution overcorrection, and contingent electric shock overcorrection.

Positive Practice Overcorrection

Positive practice overcorrection is a technique that involves requiring the individual to engage in an excessive number of correct responses following an incorrect behavior. The purpose of this technique is to provide ample practice and reinforcement of the desired behavior, with the aim of reducing the occurrence of the incorrect behavior.

During positive practice overcorrection, the individual is repeatedly guided through the correct behavior, often with verbal prompts or physical guidance. This may involve practicing the correct behavior multiple times, sometimes in a systematic and structured manner. The goal is to reinforce the correct behavior through repetition and practice, ultimately replacing the incorrect behavior with the desired behavior.

Restitution Overcorrection

Restitution overcorrection is a technique that involves requiring the individual to engage in additional efforts to restore the environment or situation to a better state following an incorrect behavior. The purpose of this technique is to teach responsibility and the consequences of one's actions.

During restitution overcorrection, the individual is not only required to correct the consequences of their behavior but also to go above and beyond to restore the situation to an even better state than before the incorrect behavior occurred. This may involve repairing or cleaning up any damage caused, making amends to those affected, or performing additional positive actions to compensate for the negative impact of the incorrect behavior.

Contingent Electric Shock Overcorrection

Contingent electric shock overcorrection is a technique that involves the delivery of an aversive stimulus (electric shock) following an incorrect behavior. The purpose of this technique is to provide a strong consequence for the incorrect behavior, with the aim of reducing its occurrence in the future.

It is important to note that the use of contingent electric shock overcorrection is highly controversial and has raised significant ethical concerns and criticisms within the field of ABA therapy. Many professionals argue that the use of aversive techniques, such as electric shock, can be detrimental and may have adverse effects on the individual's well-being and trust in the therapeutic relationship.

The decision to use any of these overcorrection techniques should be made by a qualified and experienced behavior analyst, taking into consideration the individual's specific needs, goals, and ethical considerations. It is essential to prioritize the well-being and dignity of the individual throughout the therapy process.

While overcorrection techniques can be effective in behavior modification, it is important to consider alternative approaches and strategies that focus on positive reinforcement, fading techniques, and collaborative problem-solving. These alternative approaches often prioritize the individual's autonomy, well-being, and long-term success. 

Potential Benefits and Drawbacks

Overcorrection is a controversial aspect of ABA therapy, with both potential benefits and drawbacks. It is important to consider these factors when evaluating the use of overcorrection procedures in the context of behavior modification.

Potential Benefits of Overcorrection

Proponents of overcorrection argue that it can be an effective technique for modifying behavior, particularly when dealing with self-stimulatory, maladaptive, or aggressive behaviors. Some potential benefits of overcorrection include:

  1. Increased awareness: Overcorrection procedures aim to draw attention to the behavior that needs to be modified. By providing clear and immediate consequences for the undesired behavior, individuals may become more aware of their actions and the impact they have on themselves and others.
  2. Enhanced learning: Overcorrection can help individuals understand the desired behavior by engaging them in repetitive practice and restitution. This repetitive practice can facilitate the learning process and reinforce the appropriate behavior.
  3. Reduced frequency of undesired behaviors: By consistently applying overcorrection procedures, individuals may experience a decrease in the frequency of the targeted undesired behaviors. The repetitive nature of overcorrection can help establish new behavioral patterns.
  4. Generalization of skills: Overcorrection procedures often involve practicing the desired behavior in various contexts. This can promote generalization, where individuals learn to apply the desired behavior across different situations, leading to more positive outcomes.

Potential Drawbacks and Risks

While overcorrection may have potential benefits, it is important to consider the potential drawbacks and risks associated with its use. These include:

  1. Ethical concerns: Overcorrection procedures, particularly those involving contingent electric shock, have drawn ethical concerns and criticism. The use of aversive techniques can raise questions about the well-being and dignity of individuals undergoing ABA therapy. It is crucial to carefully consider the ethics of using such procedures.
  2. Negative emotional impact: Overcorrection procedures can have a negative emotional impact on individuals. The repetitive nature of overcorrection and the emphasis on correcting behavior may lead to feelings of shame, frustration, or anxiety. This emotional impact can have long-lasting effects on an individual's well-being.
  3. Potential reinforcement of aggression: Critics argue that overcorrection procedures, especially those involving restitution, may inadvertently reinforce aggression or negative behaviors. The emphasis on correcting behavior through restitution can reinforce the use of force or aggression to correct others' actions.
  4. Lack of generalizability: While overcorrection can promote behavior change within the therapy setting, it may not always generalize to other environments or situations. Individuals may struggle to apply the learned behaviors outside of the controlled therapy setting, limiting the effectiveness of overcorrection in real-world contexts.

It is essential to carefully assess the potential benefits and drawbacks of overcorrection procedures in the context of ABA therapy. Open dialogue, ongoing evaluation, and consideration of alternative approaches, such as positive reinforcement strategies and fading techniques, can help inform decision-making and ensure the well-being of individuals undergoing behavior modification. 

Alternative Approaches to Overcorrection

While overcorrection techniques have been used in ABA therapy, there are alternative approaches that can be considered. These approaches focus on positive reinforcement, fading techniques, and collaborative problem-solving to address challenging behaviors.

Positive Reinforcement Strategies

Positive reinforcement strategies involve rewarding desired behaviors to encourage their repetition. In ABA therapy, positive reinforcement is widely used to promote positive change in behavior. Instead of focusing solely on correcting problematic behaviors, this approach emphasizes reinforcing appropriate and desired behaviors.

By identifying and implementing positive reinforcement strategies, individuals can develop new skills and behaviors that are incompatible with the problem behavior. This approach promotes a positive and supportive environment, fostering motivation and engagement. Positive reinforcement strategies can include praise, tokens, tangible rewards, or access to preferred activities. The specific reinforcement used depends on the individual's preferences and needs.

Fading Techniques

Fading techniques involve gradually reducing prompts and supports to promote independent behavior. This approach is particularly useful when individuals are overly reliant on prompts or prompts are no longer necessary. Fading techniques allow individuals to generalize skills across various settings and situations.

The fading process typically involves systematically reducing the level of assistance provided, such as physical or verbal prompts, while ensuring that the individual can still demonstrate the desired behavior. This gradual reduction allows individuals to gain confidence and independence over time. Fading techniques can be implemented in conjunction with positive reinforcement to reinforce progress and maintain motivation.

Collaborative Problem-Solving

Collaborative problem-solving involves working together with individuals to identify and address the underlying causes of challenging behaviors. This approach recognizes that challenging behaviors often stem from unmet needs or difficulties in communication and problem-solving.

By involving individuals in the problem-solving process, therapists can better understand their perspectives and motivations. This collaborative approach focuses on teaching effective communication skills, problem-solving strategies, and appropriate coping mechanisms. It aims to empower individuals to express their needs and concerns while developing more adaptive behaviors.

Collaborative problem-solving also extends beyond therapy sessions, emphasizing the importance of involving caregivers, teachers, and other relevant individuals in supporting the individual's progress. By building a collaborative network, individuals can receive consistent and comprehensive support across different environments.

Considering these alternative approaches to overcorrection in ABA therapy can provide individuals with a more positive and supportive treatment experience. Positive reinforcement strategies, fading techniques, and collaborative problem-solving foster growth, independence, and the development of adaptive behaviors. By tailoring interventions to the individual's needs, therapists can help individuals achieve meaningful and lasting behavior change.

Examining Overcorrection Techniques

In the field of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy, overcorrection is a technique used to address specific behaviors. Let's take a closer look at some of the overcorrection techniques commonly employed in ABA therapy.

Positive Practice Overcorrection

Positive Practice Overcorrection (PPO) is a procedure used to teach individuals to correct their behavior and engage in a more appropriate response. It involves providing extensive practice and repetition of the correct behavior following an error. For example, if a child spills a drink, they may be required to clean up the spill and apologize to reinforce the appropriate behavior. PPO aims to increase the likelihood of the correct response occurring in the future.

Restitution Overcorrection

Restitution Overcorrection is a technique that requires an individual to restore the environment to a better state than before the inappropriate behavior occurred. For instance, if a child damages a toy, they may be required to repair or replace the toy, as well as engage in additional positive actions such as helping others with their toys. This form of overcorrection emphasizes the consequences of one's actions and encourages responsibility for repairing the harm caused.

Contingent Electric Shock Overcorrection

Contingent Electric Shock Overcorrection is a controversial and rarely used form of overcorrection. It involves the application of a mild electric shock as a consequence for inappropriate behavior. The intent is to create an aversive stimulus that discourages the repetition of the behavior. It is important to note that this technique is highly debated within the field of ABA therapy due to ethical concerns and potential risks.

While overcorrection techniques may have their intended benefits, it is crucial to consider potential drawbacks and risks associated with their use. It is essential to approach these techniques with caution and ensure that they are implemented appropriately and ethically.

For a comprehensive understanding of overcorrection in ABA therapy, it is important to explore alternative approaches that prioritize positive reinforcement strategies, fading techniques, and collaborative problem-solving. These alternative methods focus on reinforcing desired behaviors rather than solely correcting inappropriate ones. By promoting positive learning experiences and building on strengths, these approaches can contribute to the overall success of behavior modification programs.


How do I know if my child is being overcorrected in ABA therapy?

It's important to monitor your child's behavior during and after ABA therapy sessions. Look for signs of frustration, anxiety, or reluctance to engage in therapy. If you notice any of these signs, talk to your therapist about your concerns.

What should I do if I think my child is being overcorrected?

If you think your child is being overcorrected, it's important to talk to your therapist about your concerns. Be specific about what behaviors you're seeing and how they're affecting your child. Ask the therapist to explain their approach and why they're using overcorrection.

Can overcorrection be harmful in the long term?

Yes, overcorrection can be harmful in the long term. It can damage a child's self-esteem and make them less likely to engage in positive behaviors in the future. It can also lead to feelings of shame and failure.

Are there any situations where overcorrection might be necessary?

While there are some situations where overcorrection might be necessary, it's important to use it sparingly and with caution. Overcorrection should only be used for behaviors that are harmful or dangerous, and only after other strategies have been tried first.

What are some alternative strategies to overcorrection?

There are many alternative strategies that ABA therapists can use to correct unwanted behaviors without resorting to overcorrection. These include positive reinforcement, shaping, and fading. Positive reinforcement involves rewarding positive behaviors to encourage them to continue. Shaping involves breaking down a behavior into smaller steps and rewarding each step along the way. Fading involves reducing the amount of reinforcement over time as the behavior becomes more ingrained.

Can overcorrection be traumatic for children with autism?

Yes, overcorrection can be traumatic for children with autism. Children with autism may have difficulty understanding why they're being asked to repeat a behavior over and over again. This can lead to feelings of frustration, anxiety, and even trauma. It's important to use caution when using overcorrection in ABA therapy and to monitor the child's reaction closely.


Overcorrection is a risky and potentially harmful technique used in ABA therapy. While it can be effective in correcting unwanted behaviors, it should be used with caution and only when necessary. There are many alternative strategies that ABA therapists can use to correct unwanted behaviors without resorting to overcorrection. By understanding the risks associated with overcorrection, we can ensure that children with ASD receive the most effective and compassionate care possible.


More Resources

Expert Clinicians

Our team at Adina ABA consists of highly trained, licensed, and insured professionals who are not only knowledgeable in autism care but also compassionate, culturally sensitive, and reliably dependable.
Get started today ->